Do you know what this is?

Yep! It’s the National Debt.
Staggering, isn’t it?

 

Contact us:

Blog powered by Typepad

Support Texana Review

  • SupportTexanaReview

Become a Fan

« Wind Energy's Impact on Land Value: an interview with George Clift | Main | A chat with Don Griffis about his Eagle Days »

March 21, 2008

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d83451c27469e200e551c487138833

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Wind Energy's Impact on Land Value: an interview with Steven Thompson:

Comments

Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

Texas  Land  Sales

It seems to me that the problem with such suits is that they could apply to any number of other situations - oil field being only one example. And that would be a hard to overcome later on,

Property in Turkey

Great post. I enjoyed reading thanks.

Scott

Appeals court upholds wind farm victory
chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/business/5958601.html
ABILENE, Texas — An appeals court has upheld a lower court's ruling that people can't sue over wind turbines just because they don't like how they look.

Some landowners had sued in 2005 over FPL Energy's Horse Hollow Wind Energy Center near Abilene, saying the turbines were too loud, lowered their property values and ruined their scenic views.

Before the 2006 trial, the judge wouldn't let plaintiffs argue that the towering turbines were a nuisance based on their blinking lights or how they looked. After the two-week trial in which noise levels and land values were discussed, jurors ruled in favor of FPL Energy.

In a ruling issued Thursday, the 11th Court of Appeals said the trial judge did not err because Texas law "does not provide a nuisance action for aesthetical impact." But the appeals court seemed sympathetic to landowners.

"We do not minimize the impact of FPL's wind farm by characterizing it as an emotional reaction," the judges wrote in the ruling. "Unobstructed sunsets, panoramic landscapes, and starlit skies have inspired countless artists and authors and have brought great pleasure to those fortunate enough to live in scenic rural settings. The loss of this view has undoubtedly impacted plaintiffs."

The judges also ruled that the lower court would have to reconsider how much the plaintiffs would pay FPL Energy for its court costs.

Attorney Trey Cox of Dallas, representing FPL Energy, said the company was "very pleased" with the ruling.

"We think it's the right result," he said.

Plaintiffs' attorney Steve Thompson, of Houston, did not immediately return calls or e-mails from The Associated Press seeking comment Thursday.

Horse Hollow now spans about 60,000 acres in Taylor and Nolan counties in West Texas and has more than 400 turbines, according to Juno Beach, Fla.-based FPL Energy.

Verify your Comment

Previewing your Comment

This is only a preview. Your comment has not yet been posted.

Working...
Your comment could not be posted. Error type:
Your comment has been saved. Comments are moderated and will not appear until approved by the author. Post another comment

The letters and numbers you entered did not match the image. Please try again.

As a final step before posting your comment, enter the letters and numbers you see in the image below. This prevents automated programs from posting comments.

Having trouble reading this image? View an alternate.

Working...

Post a comment

Comments are moderated, and will not appear until the author has approved them.

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

Support Texana Review

  • SupportTexanaReview

Supporters of The Texana Review